The unstoppable engine of infamy

The UN is the pivot for the west’s loss of moral compass.

Next week, the United Nations is set to reinforce infamy. In the wings of the UN General Assembly meeting in New York, it is to hold a 20th anniversary summit of its so-called World Conference against Racism that took place in Durban, South Africa, four days before the terror attacks of September 11, 2001.

The New York event is outrageous. For Durban was a terrifying circus of psychotic anti-Jewish hatred whose sole purpose was to demonise and delegitimise Israel under the Orwellian banner of “human rights”.

The latest summit — called Durban IV — is being boycotted by at least 16 countries, including Australia, Canada, France, Germany, the Netherlands, Hungary, Israel, the United Kingdom and the United States. But it’s sickening that it is still going ahead at all. For its purpose is to ratify the programme decided in 2001, a meeting that has become a byword for hatred, intimidation and bigotry against the Jews.

Under the camouflage of attempting to combat racism, Durban’s initial documentation downgraded the Holocaust, referred ludicrously to “Zionist racist practices against Semitism” and accused Israel of “ethnic cleansing of the Arab population in historic Palestine”.

Although these noxious and demonic lies were beaten back, the conference’s final declaration nevertheless specifically listed only the Palestinians as “victims of racism, racial discrimination, xenophobia and related intolerance”.

Singling out Israel as the alleged perpetrator of these horrors — a charge that peddled malign falsehoods while failing to identify any of the myriad states or groups that are indeed guilty of such behaviour, including the Palestinians themselves — was itself an act of antisemitism.

Yet this governmental part of the meeting was preceded by something much worse. This was a conference of NGOs that dominated the proceedings by turning into a Jew-baiting lynch mob.

Jewish delegates were forced to run a gauntlet of antisemitic abuse and threats. There were shrieked claims that they were murderers, flyers declaring that “Hitler should have finished the job” and pamphlets with monstrous caricatures of hook-nosed Jews depicted as Nazis spearing Palestinian children and dripping blood from their fangs.

Warned that they were in physical danger, these delegates were forced to take shelter for their safety with the Durban Jewish community.

The final NGO declaration called Israel a “racist nation” and accused it of genocide. It was all so vile that even Mary Robinson, the UN human rights commissioner who was no friend of Israel, recoiled at the language and unprecedentedly refused to formally hand the declaration to the government representatives when their part of the conference began.

As the Jerusalem Centre for Public Affairs has observed, while the NGO declaration and programme of action weren’t officially adopted by the governmental conference, their content remained on record. “The documents,” notes the JCPA, “have entered into history as one of the primary outcomes of the Durban conference. They have in fact become the ‘road map’ guiding the BDS [Boycott, Divestment and Sanctions] movement”.

This shocking hate-fest was certainly not the start of the global pogrom against Israel and the Jews.

By the time of Durban, the Palestinian Arabs’ Second Intifada had been raging for a year, blowing Israelis to kingdom come in buses and pizza parlours. And it was back in 1975 that the United Nations passed its infamous resolution declaring that Zionism was “a form of racism”.

Although that resolution was revoked in 1991, the venomous belief at its core — that the Jews alone were not entitled to self-determination in their own historic homeland, which had only ever been theirs alone and from which they had themselves been ethnically cleansed — spread through western progressive circles.

At Durban, it violently erupted in the diseased body of “human rights” culture like a global cancer. Under the imprimatur of the United Nations, Durban embedded and normalised the demonising of Israel and Jew-baiting — the apartheid libel, the insane claim that Israel was committing genocide and the grotesque equation of Israelis with the Nazis which have now poisoned much of the western “progressive” mind.

In 2009 and 2011, the United Nations tried to reaffirm the Durban programme and its delegitimisation of Israel. The 2009 Durban review conference rapidly descended into another hate-fest, with the formal opening address by Iran’s then-President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad calling for the eradication of Zionism and attributing all the ills of the world to Zionism and Israel.

Appallingly, next week’s meeting aims to reaffirm Durban once again. Its surreal proposed resolution calling for the promotion of “tolerance, inclusion and respect for diversity” and deploring the “the global rise in hate speech, constituting incitement to racial discrimination, hostility and violence” describes the 2001 Durban Declaration and programme of action as the “solid basis and the only instructive outcome of the world conference which prescribes comprehensive measures for combating all the scourges of racism and adequate remedies for victims”.

Perhaps the most shattering lesson from the Durban conference is that its antisemitic excesses were not only ignored but have been sanitised and promoted as the signature motifs of decency. The causes of “human rights” and “anti-racism” have actually been weaponised against Israel and the Jews throughout the west.

Moreover, as part of the Marxist armoury to suborn the west’s intellectual elites, these weapons have also been deployed against the west itself. As the old adage has it, what starts with the Jews never stays with the Jews.

The result is a Kafka-esque intersectionality nightmare aimed at demonising and destroying western culture and society, and in which the Jews, who figure in the imagination of the antisemitic left as a cabal covertly controlling capitalism and manipulating the world in their own interests, are deemed to be “white supremacists” and so can never be victims.

These tropes now form the discourse in most western intellectual circles. And despite the stand taken by several countries against next week’s New York disgrace, western governments continue to indulge this bigotry.

Thus America, Britain and the European Union continue to fund the Palestinian Authority, which pumps out precisely the same kind of psychotic, anti-Jewish images, lies and incitement produced at Durban.

The NGOs that contributed to the Durban auto-da-fé are still producing vicious and sustained anti-Israeli lies and incitement. Yet no governments denounce them or hold them to account.

The United Nations itself continues to act as the crucible of the campaign to delegitimise and destroy Israel. Last year, for example, the UN General Assembly adopted 17 one-sided resolutions against Israel and only six against any of the other 192 member states for human rights violations.

Last September, the UN’s Economic and Social Council condemned Israel alone for allegedly violating women’s rights — even though Israel is the only upholder of women’s rights in the Middle East.

Last May, the UN’s World Health Organisation accused Israel of violating the Palestinians’ health rights over COVID-19 — a wickedly false claim, and with Israel once again the only country to be singled out during the entire assembly.

The UN’s charter says its role is “promoting and encouraging respect for human rights and for fundamental freedoms for all without distinction as to race, sex, language or religion”.

The world body betrays this commitment almost every day. Conspicuously failing to deal with the racism and gross abuse of human rights around the world, it chooses instead to persecute Israel, a country that guarantees human rights for all its citizens.

The Durban conference displayed the moral bankruptcy of the United Nations for all to see. Yet the west continues to treat it as the legitimate arbiter of world peace and justice. Support for the United Nations is the pivot for the west’s loss of moral compass.

The boycott of the New York meeting is thus an empty gesture. It’s the United Nations itself that is allowing evil to triumph — and in which the two-faced, cowardly and self-indulgent west is all-too complicit.

Jewish News Syndicate

Recent posts

My most recent exclusive post for my premium subscribers is about Yom Kippur, the Jewish Day of Atonement, which concluded yesterday evening. This is how the piece begins:

Melanie Phillips
The day of our rejoicing
In Israel, Yom Kippur (which begins this evening) is an extraordinary experience. All shops and businesses are shut. Traffic disappears and even the traffic lights are de-activated. People walk in the roads and on the motorways. The airport shuts down. There is a palpable sense of an entire country acting as one to withdraw from the world ……
Read more

And you can read my most recent post that’s available to everyone, about the Booker Prize for ignorance, by clicking here.

One more thing…

This is how my website works.

It has two subscription levels: my free service and the premium service.

Anyone can sign up to the free service on this website. You can of course unsubscribe at any time by clicking “unsubscribe” at the foot of each email.

Everyone on the free list will receive the full text of pieces I write for outlets such as the Jewish News Syndicate and the Jewish Chronicle, as well as other posts and links to my broadcasting work.

But why not subscribe to my premium service? For that you’ll also receive pieces that I write specially for my premium subscribers. Those articles will not be published elsewhere. They’ll arrive in your inbox as soon as I have written them.

There is a monthly fee of $6.99 for the premium service, or $70 for an annual subscription. Although the fee is charged in US dollars, you can sign up with any credit card. Just click on the “subscribe now” button below to see the available options for subscribing either to the premium or the free service.

A note on subscriptions

If you purchase a subscription to my site, you will be authorising a payment to my company Dirah Associates. In the past, that is the name that may have appeared on your credit card statement. In future, though, the charge should appear instead as Melanie Phillips.

And thank you for following my work.