Brexit's Gordian knot, part two
Ripping up the Northern Ireland protocol is wrong. But the alternative is worse
When Boris Johnson signed the terms of withdrawal for the UK to leave the European Union in October 2019, he was hailed as the saviour of Britain’s Brexit decision which was almost derailed by an unholy alliance of Eurocrats and anti-Brexit “Remainer” MPs.
Some of us Brexiteers took a rather different view. We were deeply alarmed by the compromises the new prime minister had been forced to make, particularly over that part of the agreement known as the Northern Ireland Protocol.
In 2019, Johnson accepted the protocol. Now he wants to rip up those parts of it that are most harmful to the UK’s interests. Critics protest that he will thus be breaking international law. He says his proposals are both legal and essential. So is he in the wrong or is he justified?
Well, both. Please bear with me. It’s complicated.
Keep reading with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to Melanie Phillips to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.